W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2006

Re: [CLOSED] Re: Is a blank node allowed as verb?

From: Jan Wielemaker <wielemak@science.uva.nl>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:21:31 +0200
To: Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <200606121721.31636.wielemak@science.uva.nl>

Thanks

	--- Jan

P.s.	These replies were requested by Elias.  I've sent him a diff
	with fixes to the tests (syntax issues only).

On Saturday 10 June 2006 23:06, you wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> If you mean blank nodes as a predicate, they are not allowed. See
> AndyS's email which fixes the text in the spec.
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0122
>
> ---
> Please respond indicating whether you are or are not satisfied with
> this response. If you are, you can help our issue tracking system by
> prefixing the subject of your response with [CLOSED] (where this
> subject has [OK?]).
> ---
>
> -Elias
>
> [TODO: test suite fix]
>
> Jan Wielemaker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Still debugging the Prolog SPARQL parser ...  I'm stuck with
> > syntax-bnodes-04.rq:
> >
> > PREFIX : <http://example.org/ns#>
> > SELECT * WHERE { :x _:a :q }
> >
> > Using production [34], the _:a must match a Verb, but Verb [36] is only
> > VarOrIRIref | 'a'.  Verb doesn't appear to include blank node.
> >
> > I guess I'm missing something, but I did look twice with a good break
> > in between :-)  Who can enlight me?
> >
> > 	Thanks --- Jan
Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 15:24:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT