W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2006

Re: [CLOSED] Re: Multiple DataSetClause grammar?

From: Jan Wielemaker <wielemak@science.uva.nl>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:19:51 +0200
To: Elias Torres <eliast@us.ibm.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <200606121719.51235.wielemak@science.uva.nl>

Thanks

	--- Jan

On Saturday 10 June 2006 23:05, you wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> This is also a problem. Tests is one of our major focus at the moment
> since implementors are quite busy. We'll be fixing/going over these
> emails shortly. Thank you for interest in SPARQL.
>
> ---
> Please respond indicating whether you are or are not satisfied with
> this response. If you are, you can help our issue tracking system by
> prefixing the subject of your response with [CLOSED] (where this
> subject has [OK?]).
> ---
>
> -Elias
>
> [TODO: test suite fix]
>
> Jan Wielemaker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > All tests from SyntaxDev except the bnode-as-verb issue from my previous
> > mail now pass.  Trying to pass the real tests ...
> >
> > I think I'm still awake :-)
> >
> > According to the grammar, based on [5], [9] and [10], we should write
> >
> > SELECT *
> > FROM <x>
> > FROM <y>
> > ...
> >
> > But test dawg-source-simple-001 says:
> >
> > SELECT *
> > FROM <file:simple-data-1.n3> <file:simple-data-2.n3>
> > ...
> >
> > Who is right?  I suspect a typo in the grammar.
> >
> > 	Cheers --- Jan
Received on Monday, 12 June 2006 15:19:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT