[OK?] Re: fn: namespace

Richard Newman wrote:
> 
> === SPARQL doc
> 
> 1.1 Document Conventions
> 
> In this document, examples assume the following namespace prefix 
> bindings unless otherwise stated:
> 
> Prefix       IRI
> rdf          http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
> rdfs         http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
> xsd          http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
> fn           http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions
> ===
> 
> === http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/
> 
> This document describes the namespace 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/ of the XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 
> Functions and Operators and XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 2.0 
> specifications (September 2005 versions).
> ...
> Each function and operator is uniquely identified with a URI of the 
> form: “http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#name” where name is the 
> name of a function or operator, such as “max”: 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#max.
> ===
> 
> Two points:
> 
> 1. the fn IRI in the SPARQL doc terminates with neither / nor #, despite 
> the X* doc using both; this causes a few difficulties when trying to 
> expand URIs (surely <...xpath-functionsmatches> is not intended for 
> fn:matches?)
> 2. <http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions> appears to be an outdated 
> IRI, and I see no reason why the newer one cannot be used.
> 
> Suggested remedy:
> 
> ===
> fn:        http://www.w3.org/2005/xpath-functions/#
> ===

Fix applied (v1.687 of the editors' draft 
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/)

If this addresses your comment, please let us know - if you put [closed] in 
the subject line, it will help scripts that help manage this list.

	Thanks
	Andy

> 
> Thanks,
> -R
>