W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > June 2006

Re: Trivial errors in the SPARQL query spec

From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:39:43 +0100
Message-ID: <447EB5DF.7060603@hp.com>
To: Simon Gibbs <simon.gibbs@cantorva.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

Simon Gibbs wrote:
> 2.8.2 "Note that both the triple patterns involving foaf:nick will
> need to match, not that one of the other should match."
> should read "one or the other".


> Sections 2.7 and 2.8.3, compare the TOC and the document. The section
> headings are clearly inverted in one or the other place. I'm not sure which.


2.7 Blank Nodes in Query Results
2.8.3 Blank Nodes in Queries

> Section 2.7 "There is no relation between using _:a in the results and 
> any blank node label in the data graph."
> No blank node labelled "a" appears in the example result sets. Perhaps
> instead,
> "There is no relation between labels in the data graph and labels in the 
> results. a, b, c, d, r, and s are all examples of valid labels for any 
> of _:a or _:b in the graph shown."

Text changed to:
There would be no relation if the label _:a were used in the results and the
blank node label in the data graph.

> I did say trivial :-)

No problem :-)


Received on Thursday, 1 June 2006 09:39:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:07 UTC