Re: Trivial errors in the SPARQL query spec

Simon Gibbs wrote:
> 
> 2.8.2 "Note that both the triple patterns involving foaf:nick will
> need to match, not that one of the other should match."
> should read "one or the other".

Fixed

> 
> Sections 2.7 and 2.8.3, compare the TOC and the document. The section
> headings are clearly inverted in one or the other place. I'm not sure which.

Fixed:

2.7 Blank Nodes in Query Results
2.8.3 Blank Nodes in Queries

> Section 2.7 "There is no relation between using _:a in the results and 
> any blank node label in the data graph."
> 
> No blank node labelled "a" appears in the example result sets. Perhaps
> instead,
> 
> "There is no relation between labels in the data graph and labels in the 
> results. a, b, c, d, r, and s are all examples of valid labels for any 
> of _:a or _:b in the graph shown."


Text changed to:
"""
There would be no relation if the label _:a were used in the results and the
blank node label in the data graph.
"""

> 
> I did say trivial :-)

No problem :-)

	Andy

> 
> SJG