W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > February 2006

DAWG disjunction objection

From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 13:01:51 -0800
Message-ID: <43FA2E3F.8050301@dajobe.org>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

When I was a DAWG working group member, I objected to disjunction:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#disjunction
on the grounds of implementation cost.

At this time over a year later, there are people who have implemented
it, so I'd withdraw my personal objection to it (I am not speaking for
my current or former employers).

However, I've still not found the time in the last year to implement it
myself in Rasqal, or can see that changing anytime soon.  Other parts of
SPARQL are higher priority to me.

Dave
Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 21:01:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT