W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > February 2006

Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL Protocol: suboptimal examples

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:51:35 -0600
To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, dawg comments <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1140450695.26363.410.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 11:55 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
[...]
> >>  If the RDF DAWG wants to use Notation3 in a W3C Technical
> >> Report and requires a media type for Notation3 for that, it's the  
> >> WG's
> >> responsibility to do what's necessary so this can be done in  
> >> accordance
> >> with RFC 4288 and the TAG's finding on internet media types, both of
> >> which seem quite clear that use of unregistered and experimental  
> >> media
> >> types is discouraged.

I think TimBL filled out the form to start the registration procedure,
but I haven't managed to find a public record of it.

Meanwhile, I filed a cwm bug:
N3 media type registration Dan Connolly (Tuesday, 31 January)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-cwm-bugs/2006Jan/0004.html

Suppose we accept as a CR exit criterion that text/rdf+n3 be registered;
would that be an acceptable response to your comment, Bjoern?

I just double-checked the relevant process documentation this
seems consistent with it.
 http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype

FYI, I added this to the CR exit criteria in the CR request that I'm
drafting...
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/crq349

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 20 February 2006 15:51:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT