W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > February 2006

Re: sparql describe - options?! [OK?]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:27:36 -0600
To: Patrick Stickler <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Cc: ext Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1140215256.26363.295.camel@dirk.w3.org>

Apologies for the delay in responding...

On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 17:30 -0600, Patrick Stickler wrote:
[...]
> I would be happy to work with the DAWG to include coverage
> of CBDs as a recommended, albeit optional, form of description
> in SPARQL; even in a non-normative appendix of the recommendation.
> The existing W3C Member Submission for CBDs would offer a good
> starting point.

We added this text:

[[
Other possible mechanisms for deciding what information to return
include Concise Bounded Descriptions [CBD].

...

[CBD]
        CBD - Concise Bounded Description, Patrick Stickler, Nokia, W3C
        Member Submission, 3 June 2005.
]]
 -- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#describe

Leo, Richard, Patrick, please let us know whether this is a
satisfactory response to this comment.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 22:27:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT