W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > February 2006

Re: SPARQL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance [closed]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 15:58:43 -0600
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1140213523.26363.287.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 02:49 +0100, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
[...]
> >[CNF] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#conformance
> 
> Editorial remarks: rather than _x_ this should probably use <em> or
> something like that; the other appendices have a full stop after the
> letter, so the title should probably be "B. Conformance", the title
> of Appendix A. is "SPARQL Grammar" not "grammar", similar for appendix
> E; the references to the other appendices should be links.

fixed in 1.642  2006/02/17 21:56:56 

> The references section still has the RFC2119 reference that's never
> referred to in the text, the usual "the key words ... in RFC 2119"
> text seems to be missing. I assume that's editorial aswell.

RFC2119 cite struck.

> I didn't review the draft against SpecGL in detail, but with these
> editorial nits fixed, I think I'm happy with this. Thanks.

You're quite welcome.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 17 February 2006 21:58:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT