W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > April 2006

Re: Test/grammar question

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:27:32 -0500
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
Cc: Geoff Chappell <gchappell@intellidimension.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1144682852.14764.852.camel@dirk.w3.org>

On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 16:19 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> 
> 
> Geoff Chappell wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just started running through the test cases to see what I needed to do 
> > to bring my sparql implementation up to date. I got a parsing error on 
> > the test:
> > 
> > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/#bgp-bnode-predicate-1
> > 
> > which didnąt surprise me since I figured the grammar had likely changed 
> > some since I last looked.
> > 
> > I canąt seem to see how the published grammar would accept the 
> > BLANK_NODE_LABEL, though, in that position. Am I missing something, or 
> > is this a problem with the grammar?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Geoff
> 
> The grammar will no longer accept a blank node in the predicate decision. 
> This was clarified only recently (the definitions and the grammar were out of 
> step for a time).  The tests involving blank nodes in the predicate position 
> need fixing.

Andy, I need to find the relevant WG decisions and make sure they're
linked from
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#punctuationSyntax 

Any help you can give is appreciated.

It's not urgent.

Maybe they already are linked. I intend to double-check somehow.

> 
> 	Thanks for pointing it out
> 	Andy

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
office: tel:+1-617-395-0241
mobile: tel:+1-816-616-6576
mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org
Received on Monday, 10 April 2006 15:27:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:50 GMT