- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:53:53 -0500
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: kendall@monkeyfist.com, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 15:12 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: > Hi Kendal, > > I'm starting the review of SPARQL do you prefer one mail with all > comments? > Or an individual mail by comment? I expect the best will be one message for each of your top 3 or 4 comments, and then a batch for the rest. To the extent that you have independent comments that are requests to change the protocol (and not just the description of the protocol), please send those in separate messages. It's probably easiest to batch up editorial suggestions, i.e. change requests that you're happy for the editor to do with as he pleases. > > SPARQL Protocol for RDF > W3C Working Draft 14 September 2005 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/ > > > Best -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 19:54:01 UTC