- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 08:56:27 -0500
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Geoff Chappell <geoff@sover.net>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Geoff, sorry for the delay in responding. Eric, I think you're the most swapped in on how boolean effective values and unbound vars work. Would you please take a look at this comment from 29 Mar 2005? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2005Mar/0090.html In particular, please find text in http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050419/ or a more recent editor's draft that explains how both tests can be right, or fix the tests. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E see you at XTech in Amsterdam 24-27 May?
Received on Thursday, 12 May 2005 13:56:31 UTC