- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:40:50 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:03:43 -0600, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > insert/update isn't among our requirements or even objectives > so far. i.e. the WG seems to think we can advance the state of the > art without doing INSERT just yet. If you think W3C shouldn't do > a QL at all without insert, please elaborate. Thanks Dan, the charter's the charter. I'm sure the language will be advancing the state of the art, INSERT or not. But I wonder if there would be as many RDBMS-backed Web sites if SQL didn't have INSERT (and DELETE). Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 20:40:51 UTC