W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > March 2005

Re: Comments on SPARQL draft (pt. 1.1)

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:01:17 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd05032107014054894f@mail.gmail.com>
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

3.1 Matching RDF Literals...

Please disregard my comment. What I had in mind was being able to
match against the literal string, irrespective of whether it had a
language tag. On second thoughts this wouldn't be much practical use
(I'd mixed up ?x ?p "cat" with :s :p ?x).

Thanks again,
Danny.


On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:12:43 +0000, Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com> wrote:
> Danny Ayers wrote:
> > Oops, missed a bit:
> >
> > [[
> > 3.1 Matching RDF Literals
> > ...the query processor does not have to have any understand ony of the
> > values in the space of the datatype.
> > ]]
> > Is there a friendlier way of saying "the space of the datatype"?
> >
> > [[
> > Matching Language Tags
> > ]]
> > I wonder if it might be useful to allow a wildcard here, along the lines of:
> >
> > "cat"@* matches "cat"
> > and
> > "cat"@* matches "cat"@en
> >
> 
> Don't follow. "cat"@* has to match one kind of thing.
> 
> Various tests can be done with FILTER:
> 
> Match things with some language tag:
> 
> ?v ... FILTER lang(?v) != ""
> 
> 
>         Andy
> 
> 


-- 

http://dannyayers.com
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 15:01:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:48 GMT