Re: SPARQL: XML 1.1 EBNF normative

>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ refers
> to XML 1.1 for the normative definition of the EBNF syntax defined
> there, yet XML 1.1 is not a normative reference.

Oops... quite right.

> Please make XML 1.1
> a normative reference

OK, we will.

We have made the change in an editor's draft (v1.436, 1.437), in case
you'd like to double-check it.

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#grammar
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#XML11

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#chlog

Thanks for the careful review.
Please let us know whether this response addresses your comment
to your satisfaction.

> or include the normative definition of EBNF
> in a normative section of the document.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E