On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 04:10 +0200, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: [...] > common W3C practise and depends on authors, developers (think XSLT > authors or JavaScript developers processing AJAX Sparql results) > doing more work (remember more complicated names, typing more), I > don't think any harm would be done if it is changed to > > http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql > http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results > > or something along those lines. OK... that's a reasonable argument. I have forwarded it to the WG for consideration. I expect we'll get back to you within a week or two. Please stand by. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Friday, 22 July 2005 02:23:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT