W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > July 2005

Re: SPARQL: Charmod conformance

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 03:55:56 +0200
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <43254eca.231195140@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Dan Connolly wrote:
>>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ does not
>> conform to <http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-charmod-20050215/> (e.g.,
>> content is not required to conform to the character model),
>
>As far as I know, it is.
>
>An example of a SPARQL query string that's allowed
>by this spec but not by charmod would make your point more clear.

Can you publicly interchange sparql queries? If so, it is possible to
include private use code points in string literals (assuming that the
format is actually based on Unicode, it does not say) which would then
violate C073. But that's not what I mean, charmod notes

  A specification conforms to this document if it:
  ...
    3. where applicable, requires implementations conforming
       to the specification to conform to this document,
    4. where applicable, requires content conforming to the
       specification to conform to this document.

I think this is applicable but there is no normative reference to
charmod. Apart from the external storage issue, I would be satisfied
if the draft notes that content is required to conform to charmod and
implementations are required to conform to charmod.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Friday, 22 July 2005 01:56:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT