W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > July 2005

SPARQL: IRIs vs RDF URI References

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:07:52 +0200
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <431638d0.225569265@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

Dear RDF Data Access Working Group,

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050721/ notes
in section 2.2, "Note that all IRIs are absolute; they may or may
not include a fragment identifier [3987, sec 3.1].  Also note that
IRIs include URIs [13] and URLs.  This definition also matches the
definition of RDF URI Reference from [12]." My reading of the re-
ference is that this is incorrect (depending on "matches"). RDF
allows for example U+0020 in its notion of "URI reference". Please
change the draft such that it does not make such apparently con-
tradictory statements.

regards,
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Friday, 22 July 2005 00:08:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT