public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from January 2005 by subject

A reason for dropping seperate AND clauses

BP input to DAWG/SPARQL (esp SOURCE, UNSAID) still wanted

Does the QL allow for false or contradictory datasets?

flexible SPARQL reification construct instead of hard-wired SOURCE keyword

generalizing SOURCE in SPARQL for extended rdf stores

minor typo in WD-rdf-sparql-query-20041012 'foaf:box' -> 'foaf:mbox'

N3 media-type in SPARQL protocol

proposal to drop DESCRIBE from SPARQL

rdql and n3 graphPatterns

SPARQL Protocol for RDF / feedback (fwd)

SPARQL Variable Binding Results XML Format

Turtle Tuples: Turtle-based query result format

Last message date: Monday, 31 January 2005 21:42:41 UTC