All places where I claim to have "fixed" something refer to fixes in the editor's draft [SED] On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 08:28:07PM -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: > > Nice work on the new spec :) you're such a sweet-talker. > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/ > > 11.2.1.7 sop:lang > > Unless I misunderstand the example, I would have > expected "lang(?name)" in the following example, > since ?name binds to the lang-tagged literal, whereas > ?mbox binds to the non-Literal (and hence not > lang-tagged) mailbox node. > [[ > PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> > SELECT ?name1 > WHERE ( ?x foaf:name ?name ) > ( ?x foaf:mbox ?mbox ) > AND lang(?mbox) EQ "ES" > ]] fixed. [[ PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> SELECT ?name ?mbox WHERE ( ?x foaf:name ?name ) ( ?x foaf:mbox ?mbox ) AND lang(?name) EQ "ES" => name mbox "Roberto"@ES <mailto:bob@work.example> ]] > (editorial) Perhaps cross-references between that section and 3.1 i.e. > http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20050217/#matchingRDFLiterals > would help too? haven't figured out where to work that in yet. suggestions? > Comparing those two examples, I am left wondering > whether 11.2.1.7 is in error by having: > > "Roberto" > > ...in the Query result table, rather than > > "Roberto"@en fixed > ...since ?name is binding to the entire literal > including lang tag, not just the 'payload' text. > I'd also have expected "SELECT ?name, ?mbox" > rather than "SELECT ?name1", thinking about it... fixed [SED] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +81.90.6533.3882 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:41:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:47 GMT