W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2005

Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? [CLOSED]

From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:01:29 -0800
Message-Id: <07DC5517-E6DC-4EC6-922F-53425FCCAAE6@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com

   I'm happy for this issue to be closed for the current version of  
SPARQL. It might be good to revisit this issue in the future, though.


On 21 Dec 2005, at 03:39, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

> The working group has considered this comment but in the end it  
> decided to leave "CONSTRUCT *" out of this version of SPARQL.
> --------
> PROPOSED: to leave out CONSTRUCT *, as the cost of delaying the  
> SPARQL spec to work out the design details, and the risk of  
> conflict with rules designs, outweighs the convenience of adding it
> --------
> There is some discussion from
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/ 
> 0266.html
> Addressing some restricted, simple cases, and not others, didn't  
> motivate the working group members, given that a quick, restricted  
> design may block later designs as well as have potential  
> interactions with rules.
> Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment.
> If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the
> subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping.
> 	Andy
Received on Friday, 23 December 2005 23:58:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT