W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2005

Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? [CLOSED]

From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:01:29 -0800
Message-Id: <07DC5517-E6DC-4EC6-922F-53425FCCAAE6@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
To: andy.seaborne@hp.com

Andy,
   I'm happy for this issue to be closed for the current version of  
SPARQL. It might be good to revisit this issue in the future, though.

   Thanks,
-Richard

On 21 Dec 2005, at 03:39, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

>
> The working group has considered this comment but in the end it  
> decided to leave "CONSTRUCT *" out of this version of SPARQL.
>
> --------
> PROPOSED: to leave out CONSTRUCT *, as the cost of delaying the  
> SPARQL spec to work out the design details, and the risk of  
> conflict with rules designs, outweighs the convenience of adding it
> ACCEPTED
> --------
>
> There is some discussion from
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/ 
> 0266.html
>
> Addressing some restricted, simple cases, and not others, didn't  
> motivate the working group members, given that a quick, restricted  
> design may block later designs as well as have potential  
> interactions with rules.
>
> Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment.
>
> If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the
> subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping.
>
> 	Andy
Received on Friday, 23 December 2005 23:58:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT