W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2005

Re: using sparql to generate test reports for RDF graphs [OK?]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:31:54 -0600
To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1134408714.2319.328.camel@dirk>

On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 14:32 +0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm not up-to-date with recent dawg developments, just posting this work here in case it's relevant to current discussion ...
> 
> A little while ago I wrote up an idea to use SPARQL queries to generate test reports for RDF graphs, an idea that is analagous to the use of schematron for XML instances, and did a test implementation [1].  Based on this work, I've written up some 'test cases' specifically relating to the use of SKOS Core [2]. 

This looks nifty; thanks for reporting your experience.
You might point to it from http://esw.w3.org/topic/DawgShows and/or
http://esw.w3.org/topic/SparqlImplementations . Or I might, or
somebody else might; it's world-writeable.

Just to be sure... your experience doesn't suggest any changes
to the SPARQL design, does it?


> Cheers,
> 
> Alistair.
> 
> [1] http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/schemarama/
> [2] http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/cvs-public/~checkout~/skos/drafts/integrity.html


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 17:33:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT