Re: [OK?] SPARQL: W3C QA Guidelines conformance

* Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>oops, forgot to put [OK?] in the subject...

I told you it's easy to forget... :-)

>> If this is satisfactory, please indicate so in a response (with
>> [CLOSED] in the subject, if you wish). If not, please send more 
>> feedback.
>> 
>> [CNF] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/#conformance

At a first glance I see there is a normative reference [RFC2119] but
it's not used in the document. Huh? There is also a stray reference to
DanC in the title of the appendix, I guess it should not be there...
Other than that the appendix looks sensible, but I'll have to look at
the protocol and results format drafts some more.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Friday, 9 December 2005 14:24:21 UTC