W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > August 2005


From: Richard Newman <rich@holygoat.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:18:29 -0700
Message-Id: <5E04DF39-0D4D-4ED1-831F-C27597F5305E@holygoat.co.uk>
To: Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com>, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org

   I'm forwarding this to the DAWG list, where folk more  
knowledgeable than I will be able to provide comments.


On 19 Aug 2005, at 07:33, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:

> Rich,
> I think I mentioned this before, but one thing that would be nice to
> have in SPARQL is the "GROUP BY" function (in SQL, and now XSLT 2.0).
> Do you know if there's been talk of that?
> In the citeprc, the most complicated processing is probably the
> grouping stuff.  Doing it in XSLT 1.0 is even more complicated.  I saw
> Danny A. mnetion it awhile back on his blog, but am not finding much
> more.
> The XML result format, BTW, is cool, and I could see just piping it to
> an XSLT processor, except for the limitation that XML content is
> escaped.  I guess one could pipe it first though a script that
> reconstructed it.  Oh well, no time to seriously think about this now
> anyway.
> Bruce
Received on Saturday, 20 August 2005 08:31:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:06 UTC