W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > August 2005

Re: twinql Retrospective (DESCRIBE refinement)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:00:39 -0500
To: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1124319639.5099.81.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:34 -0700, Richard Newman wrote:
[...]
>    Filter functions are complex, but necessarily so. I can't produce  
> a recommendation to simplify them.
> 
>    As I write, it occurs to me that some way to say which method is  
> being (server -> client), or should be (client -> server), used for  
> DESCRIBE would be desirable -- I'd like my clients to know that  
> they're getting CBDs, or the clients might wish to ask for a certain  
> kind of description.

OK, we'll think about that a bit and get back to you.

> [1] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/twinql/>
> [2] <http://wilbur-rdf.sourceforge.net/>
> [3] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/blog/entry/2005-07-12-3>
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 23:00:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT