W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > August 2005

Re: twinql Retrospective (UNION implementation experience)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:59:10 -0500
To: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1124319550.5099.78.camel@dirk> 

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:34 -0700, Richard Newman wrote:
[...]
>    I have seen objections made to UNION, on the grounds that  
> implementation is difficult. I'd like to nip that one in the bud; I  
> wrote twinql in a few weeks, not full-time, inventing algorithms as I  
> went, and UNION wasn't difficult.

Noted. Thanks.


> [1] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/twinql/>
> [2] <http://wilbur-rdf.sourceforge.net/>
> [3] <http://www.holygoat.co.uk/blog/entry/2005-07-12-3>
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 17 August 2005 22:59:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT