* Dan Connolly wrote: >C073 [C] Publicly interchanged content SHOULD NOT use codepoints in >the private use area. > >But that's not a requirement; it says SHOULD NOT. Well, Charmod notes NOTE: RFC 2119 makes it clear that requirements that use SHOULD are not optional and must be complied with unless there are specific reasons not to ... I'm not sure there is a SPARQL query that violates a reasonably machine- testable charmod conformance requirement, yet the Charmod specification requires reference to the specification. What'd work best for me here would be that the I18N Core WG reviews the draft for conformance with their Character model specifications, it should be easier for them to tell which requirements are applicable and not currently met by the draft and make recommendations how to change that. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Monday, 1 August 2005 19:47:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:49 GMT