W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2004

sparql comments

From: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 10:47:47 +0200
Message-ID: <416E3D33.8090708@gnowsis.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org


*the example is not correct FOAF. *
this is not very wise in a reference.
try using:
<_1> <foaf:mbox> <mailto:alice@work.example>
*the mailto: misses*

On the optional clause:
I would remove the [] syntax completely. It is only distracting to have 
two ways.
the "OPTIONAL ( )" thing looks more like normal SQL and people will 
recognise it
I would abbreviate it with "OPT ()"
it is clearly better to have the optional thing expressed in human 
readable syntax.

Received on Thursday, 14 October 2004 08:47:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:05 UTC