W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2017

Re: Proposed fixed version of N-Triples https://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/ Section 7

From: Wouter Beek <wouter@triply.cc>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:02:56 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEh2WcN-PYKZ=ybB4YpewHuqBzK2CG5FvE+BKYdGJu_dkQaQUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-comments Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Hi Dan, others,

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote:
> It would be good to have some testcases annotated as being unchanged,
> previously-ok-now-illegal, previously-illegal-now-ok, etc.

In addition to more test cases, it would also be nice if the status of
some of the existing test cases could be further clarified.  For
example, the test case that checks for parser conformance in case
there are no whitespaces between the subject, predicate and object
term of an N-Triple was of type `rdft:Proposed', which means "a test
is proposed, but not approved."

The "proposed" status may be a reason why some state-of-the-art parser
do not pass this test.

Best regards,
Wouter Beek.

Email: wouter@triply.cc
WWW: http://triply.cc
Tel: +31647674624
Received on Friday, 30 June 2017 07:52:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 30 June 2017 07:52:32 UTC