- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:19:36 -0700
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: RDF Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On Sep 3, 2015, at 10:36 AM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've added some more tests at the gist: > https://gist.github.com/RubenVerborgh/39f0e8d63e33e435371a > > I am now also happy to report that N3.js passes all of them: > https://github.com/RubenVerborgh/N3.js/blob/457fa99/test/N3Parser-test.js#L915-L1232 > > I'd appreciate if you could help verify whether the cases in the gist are indeed correct; > if so, then I'll release N3.js 0.4.4 with correct IRI resolution. Hi Ruben. I’m still concerned that there are issues with some of the tests in the gist. I see you changed some of the tests I mentioned, but didn’t change or comment on others. Some of the new additions are also concerning to me. I haven’t had time to go through these in detail again, but here’s a list of my concerns (with my intuition of what should be produced but isn't): Previously mentioned: s154 (should not include /ccc/) New issues: s212–s214 (should include /ccc/) s218 (should include /ccc/) s220–s224 (should include /ccc/) s226–s230 (should include /bb/ccc/ or /bb/) s238–s251 (should include /bb/ccc/ or /bb/) Thoughts? thanks, .greg
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2015 18:20:02 UTC