W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > October 2013

Re: rdfs:Graph ? comment on http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-dataset and issue 35 (ISSUE-142)

From: Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:27:07 +0200
Message-ID: <52651D9B.5060101@vu.nl>
To: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
CC: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Hi Jeremy,

I read your draft text. It's very readable and I think the tone is fair.

I haven't consulted the WG on this, but I think it likely we would 
definitely agree with recording this as a postponed issue (in fact, we 
should have done that already).

Guus Schreiber
RDF WG co-chair



On 18-10-13 23:18, Jeremy J Carroll wrote:
> FYI
>
> Here is a first draft of my formal objection.
> I am very open to suggested rephrasings to:
> - correct factual errors
> - adjust tone and readability
> - increase effectiveness
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013Oct/att-0031/fo.html
>
>
> Jeremy J Carroll
>
>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>> The WG discussed your response today. We're extremely sorry that we have not been able to get to consensus on this. At his point we see no alternative but to leave the situation unchanged.
>>>
>>> With respect to our time line: we expect to send the CR transition request  on 23 Oct. There will be a time gap of at least one week between the request and the transition call with the director.
>>>
>>> We hope you understand our position. Thanks again for the trouble and time you've taken in reviewing our documents.
>>>
>>> Very best,
>>> Guus
>
Received on Monday, 21 October 2013 12:27:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:58 UTC