- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:08 +0200
- To: Andreas Harth <harth@kit.edu>
- Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org, Aidan Hogan <aidan.hogan@deri.org>, richard@cyganiak.de
On 26 May 2013, at 13:14, Andreas Harth <harth@kit.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just stumpled across the Note about N-Quads. > > You might want to reference our earlier document specifying > N-Quads [1]. Actually, you should. I wonder if this cannot be reduced down to triples again by going through a content relation, relating a URI to the representation received from it: <http://server.example/doc> :content [ turtle "<http://server.example/doc#me> a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person> ." ] . or in short <http://server.example/doc> :content "<http://server.example/doc#me> a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person> ."^^lang:turtle . No need for quads. You get the quad by indirection through a literal. Now the question is can the :content relation be made to be equivalent to cwm's log:semantics ? Ie. can we have the datatype lang:turtle be a map from a string to a graph where the string is interpreted as turtle? Henry > > Regards, > Andreas. > > [1] http://sw.deri.org/2008/07/n-quads/ > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Sunday, 26 May 2013 13:06:45 UTC