W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > May 2013

Re: N-Quads TR

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 15:06:08 +0200
Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org, Aidan Hogan <aidan.hogan@deri.org>, richard@cyganiak.de
Message-Id: <2950F9EC-E04D-4D9E-886A-81DCE817C6C6@bblfish.net>
To: Andreas Harth <harth@kit.edu>

On 26 May 2013, at 13:14, Andreas Harth <harth@kit.edu> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I've just stumpled across the Note about N-Quads.
> 
> You might want to reference our earlier document specifying
> N-Quads [1].  Actually, you should.

I wonder if this cannot be reduced down to triples again by going
through a content relation, relating a URI to the representation received 
from it:

<http://server.example/doc> :content [ turtle "<http://server.example/doc#me> a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person> ." ] .

or in short 

<http://server.example/doc> :content "<http://server.example/doc#me> a <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person> ."^^lang:turtle .

No need for quads. You get the quad by indirection through a literal.

Now the question is can the :content relation be made to be equivalent to cwm's log:semantics ? Ie. can we have
the datatype lang:turtle be a map from a string to a graph where the string is interpreted as turtle?


Henry


> 
> Regards,
> Andreas.
> 
> [1] http://sw.deri.org/2008/07/n-quads/
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Received on Sunday, 26 May 2013 13:06:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:56 UTC