W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > May 2013

Re: RDF-ISSUE-128 JSON-LD-1.0 Last call comment: Mandatory profiles for JSON-LD document interchange

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 12:14:43 -0700
Cc: "'Peter Ansell'" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Message-Id: <833A2729-5FDE-46D9-94AB-39F12536AB86@greggkellogg.com>
To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>

On May 9, 2013, at 11:30 AM, "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net> wrote:

> On Thursday, May 09, 2013 4:41 AM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> 
>> I would be satisfied if the following passage in Section E,
>> 
>>    "The profile parameter may be used by clients to express their
>>    preferences in the content negotiation process."
>> 
>> was modified to something like:
>> 
>>    "The profile parameter MAY be used by clients to express their
>>    preferences in the content negotiation process. If the profile
>>    parameter is given a server SHOULD return a document that is
>>    structured based on the profiles in the list which are recognized
>>    by the server."
> 
> Sounds reasonable. Does someone object including this statement?

+1

Gregg

>> I also have one minor editorial change to another sentence in Section E:
>> 
>>    "When processing the "profile" media type parameter, it is
>>    important to note that its value is contains one or more URIs and
>>    not IRIs."
>> 
>> should be:
>> 
>>    "When processing the "profile" media type parameter, it is
>>    important to note that its value contains one or more URIs and
>>    not IRIs."
> 
> Fixed: https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/commit/ba0f6495fb735fa58ea08fa70bd2cd69e82427f7
> Thanks for reporting it.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 9 May 2013 19:14:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:56 UTC