W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Turtle test donations

From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 10:06:45 +1000
Message-ID: <CAGYFOCSK10jcryCJNE7gHN0SU29zFpgQwiSGmSFjBa6kRNuX6A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 24 March 2013 08:38, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> wrote:
> I reviewed the Turtle 2013 doc and the test suite hanging out in mercurial a
> few weeks ago at
>   https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/
> I'm still not clear if these define conformance; I asked about this in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Feb/0026.html
>
> I've got some tests I made for raptor after the original Turtle submission
> that the WG might want to use.  I give permission for them to be used
> under the W3C software license
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
>
> This is what they test:
>    test-33.ttl - \\ at end of """
>    test-35.ttl - what are rules for "foo"@lang^^uri ?
>    test-36.ttl - check for greedy lexers
>    test-37.ttl - long literal with lang tag
>    test-38.ttl - unicode surrogates ok or not
>
> test-35 is not strictly legal but I had to decide what to do; I dropped
> the language.

In RDF-1.1 if the type uri was rdf:langString I would expect the
language could be preserved.

Peter
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 00:07:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:55 UTC