W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

RE: The tone of the "JSON-LD vs. RDF" debate (was re: Sub-issue on the re-definition of Linked Data)

From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:05:53 +0200
To: <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00d101ce6825$fa0eddc0$ee2c9940$@lanthaler@gmx.net>
On Thursday, June 13, 2013 12:53 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> I don't know the source of the following (unless Sven was
> suggesting it), but it's certainly clearer:

It was suggested by David Booth on the JSON-LD telecon


> "JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11_CONCEPTS].
> Hence, a JSON-LD document is both an RDF document and a JSON
> document and correspondingly represents both an instance of the RDF
> data model and an instance of the JSON-LD data model."

It's already in the current editors draft:
  http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/

The other statement is as well - and as soon you guys come to an agreement
I'm happy to update the wording.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 11:06:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:57 UTC