- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:04:12 -0400
- To: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 06/12/2013 02:09 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 6/12/13 2:04 PM, David Booth wrote: >> On 06/12/2013 01:27 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> [ . . . ] >>> A little tweak, for consideration. >>> >>> JSON-LD was designed to be usable by developers as idiomatic JSON, >>> with no need to understand RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. However, JSON-LD >>> was also designed to be RDF compatible, so people intending to use >> >> -1 >> >> "compatible with RDF" wrongly suggests that JSON-LD is *not* RDF. >> >> David >> >> >> > "..However, JSON-LD was also designed to be usable as RDF.." > > What does that mean? > > How is something usable as RDF? > > Let's try this then: > > JSON-LD was designed to be usable by developers as idiomatic JSON, > with no need to understand RDF [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. However, people > intending to use > JSON-LD with RDF tools will find it can be used like any other > RDF syntax. Complete details of how JSON-LD relates to RDF are in > C. Relationship to RDF. > > Change: > > I removed "JSON-LD was also designed to be usable as RDF, so" -1 That makes it unclear that JSON-LD is RDF. David
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 19:04:39 UTC