W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > June 2013

Re: The tone of the "JSON-LD vs. RDF" debate (was re: Sub-issue on the re-definition of Linked Data)

From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:08:51 -0500
Cc: "'public-rdf-comments'" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5BBB4897-5274-4C61-8DFF-0EBCDB01B645@ihmc.us>
To: "Markus Lanthaler" <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>

On Jun 11, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:19 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>> On Jun 11, 2013, at 5:02 AM, Markus Lanthaler wrote:
>>> We were asked by members of the RDF WG to add this section. In fact,
> Richard
>>> wrote most of it, I just completed it because he got busy otherwise.
> There
>>> why reason it is there, is because the data models are not exactly the
> same.
>>> JSON-LD allows bnodes for graph labels and predicates wheras RDF's data
>>> model does not.
>> I know there are these slight differences, and I do not mean to imply
>> that they are not important. But still, the JSON-LD model is clearly a
>> slight generalization of RDF. It is not something completely different.
>> It could be explained, for example, by saying that its the RDF model
>> with two generalizations. (The bnodes-for-predicates generalization is
>> already widely known in the RDF literature, invented by terHorst in
>> 2004, and could be cited.) But to re-state all the rest of the model as
>> though it was something wholly new, without any reference to RDF at
>> all, is (to repeat myself) deliberately misleading.
> So, you are raising a new point then. You want the data model section to be
> replaced with a statement saying that JSON-LD serializes the "RDF['s data]
> model with two generalizations" citing terHorst for the
> "bnodes-for-predicates generalization".

No doubt that would not fly, so I will not attempt it. But how about adding a sentence something like this to appendix A, end of first paragraph:

"These definitions correspond closely, both in terminology and in general structure, to the abstract syntax of RDF datasets and RDF graphs."


IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Wednesday, 12 June 2013 05:09:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:57 UTC