- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 10:00:18 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, 'public-rdf-comments' <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On 06/10/2013 11:49 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > I think there may be other positive outcomes. Without getting into > them, I think there might be a compromise in mentioning RDF toward the > beginning in a very careful way that preserves some distance and does > not make people feel they should go off and read about RDF. Something > like this in the Introduction: > > JSON-LD was designed to be compatible with Semantic Web technologies > like RDF and SPARQL. People intending to use JSON-LD with RDF tools > will find it can be used as another RDF syntax, like Turtle. > Complete details of how JSON-LD relates to RDF are in Appendix C. +0.5, I could live with something like this. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: Meritora - Web payments commercial launch http://blog.meritora.com/launch/
Received on Tuesday, 11 June 2013 14:00:47 UTC