W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > July 2013

owl:imports and graph names and issue 38

From: Jeremy J Carroll <jjc@syapse.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:15:56 -0700
Message-Id: <A88578E7-B0FE-4250-BBB5-27EE44858B9A@syapse.com>
To: "public-rdf-comments@w3.org Comments" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>

This is a formal comment on RDF Concepts 1.1

I am concerned that the resolution of issue 38 leaves a disconnect.

In particular, I think it is common practice to have datasets


<g1>  {

    <g1> rdf:type owl:Ontology
}


<g2> {


    <g2> rdf:type owl:Ontology ;
          owl:imports <g1> .
}


and this practice is somewhat undermined by the resolution of issue-38 which leaves a disconnect (^sd:name sd:graph) between the name and the graph.


Jeremy J Carroll
Principal Architect
Syapse, Inc.
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2013 19:16:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 11 July 2013 19:16:26 UTC