- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 23:36:19 -0500
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- CC: public-rdf-comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
On 12/15/2013 01:59 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: . . . > My final suggestion for wording would be: > >>>> IRIs have global scope by design. Thus, two different >>>> appearances of an IRI always have the same meaning. The RDF >>>> model is based on this principle, and violations of it may lead >>>> to interoperability problems. That feels like a step in the wrong direction. I think talking about "meaning" instead of "denotation" here would create even more confusion. David
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 04:36:48 UTC