W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > December 2013

[RESOLVED] Re: N-Triples - Editorial issues

From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 14:17:43 -0500
Message-ID: <52A0D157.30209@dbooth.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org


On 12/05/2013 01:42 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 03/12/13 22:52, David Booth wrote:
>>
>> 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/#dfn-canonical-n-triple-document
>> says: "Characters MUST be represented directly and not by UCHAR."
>>
>> Shouldn't that be something like: "Characters allowed directly in
>> STRING_LITERAL_QUOTE MUST be represented directly and not by UCHAR." ?
>
> Peter Ansell has a related and overlapping comment [*] - if I may, I'll
> combine the comments and respond once there.
>
> [*]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Nov/0087.html
>
>> 2. Throughout the document, the name of the language is inconsistently
>> spelled, sometimes as "N-Triples" and sometimes as "N-Triple"
>> (singular).  PLEASE make the spelling consistent as "N-Triples"
>> throughout.  This is more important than you may think, because
>> inconsistency in the spec encourages inconsistent spellings in the wild
>> among tools, which just causes unnecessary headache and wasted time for
>> users.
>
> Done in the editors working draft.  I also applied the same rules to the
> N-Quads document.
>
> Please reply with "[RESOLVED]" in the subject line to acknowledge
> handling of this part of your comment.

This part of my comment has been resolved to my satisfaction.

Thanks!
David
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2013 19:18:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 5 December 2013 19:18:14 UTC