- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 09:14:34 -0400
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>, Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, public-rdf-comments Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>
As a result of previous edits, I think the flow at the beginning of section 9 needs a little tweaking now, to smooth it out a bit. it currently says: [[ JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document and a JSON document and correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model, namely generalized RDF Datasets. The extensions to the RDF data model are: ]] Two small glitches: (a) "The extensions" were not previously mentioned; and (b) by default a JSON-LD docuemnt represents an instance of a *standard* RDF Dataset -- not a Generalized RDF Dataset. I suggest changing that beginning to: [[ JSON-LD is a concrete RDF syntax as described in [RDF11-CONCEPTS]. Hence, a JSON-LD document is an RDF document /and/ a JSON document and correspondingly represents an instance of an RDF data model. However, JSON-LD also extends the RDF data model to optionally allow a JSON-LD document to represent a Generalized RDF Dataset. The JSON-LD extensions to the RDF data model are: ]] Thanks, David On 08/08/2013 08:31 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: > On 08/08/2013 01:57 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: >>> http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#data-model-overview >>> >>> Let me know if that's not acceptable to you and we can try again. >> >> That handles my feedback comment adequately. I would suggest a tiny edit: >> >> Developers that are familar /// Developers who are familar > > Fixed, thanks. :) > > -- manu >
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 13:15:07 UTC