public-rdf-comments@w3.org from April 2013 by author

Andy Seaborne

• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: normalization issues with Turtle spec tests (Sunday, 7 April)

Bo Ferri

• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Saturday, 27 April)

Boris Zbarsky

• [json-ld] The options argument to JsonLdProcessor.compact should perhaps be the last argument (Friday, 12 April)

Dave Beckett

• [RESOLVED] Re: Turtle 2013 test suite comment (Monday, 8 April)
• [RESOLVED] Re: Turtle tests defining conformance (Monday, 8 April)
• [RESOLVED] Re: Turtle test donations (Monday, 8 April)
• [RESOLVED] Re: surrogates is literals (Monday, 8 April)

Dave Longley

• Re: Futures (Wednesday, 17 April)

David Booth

• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)

David Robillard

• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Friday, 19 April)

David Wood

• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: RDF/JSON (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Wednesday, 24 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: normalization issues with Turtle spec tests (Sunday, 7 April)
• Re: normalization issues with Turtle spec tests (Saturday, 6 April)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Futures (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Turtle Test Cases License Grant (Wednesday, 10 April)
• Request for Grant for Contributed Test Cases (Wednesday, 10 April)

Gregg Kellogg

• Re: node-n3 Turtle parser => compliance report? (Wednesday, 10 April)

Gregory Williams

• Comment on N-Triples document (was: Re: Comments regarding "Turtle and N-Triples Synaxes for RDF") (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Thursday, 25 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)

Guus Schreiber

• Re: Comment on N-Triples document (Thursday, 25 April)

Hong Sun

• Re: [PROPOSAL: Turtle: EDITORIAL. Concepts: Non-ED] Language Tag Case Conflict (between RDF1.1 and BCP47) (Thursday, 4 April)
• Re: [PROPOSAL: Turtle: EDITORIAL. Concepts: Non-ED] Re: Language Tag Case Conflict (between RDF1.1 and BCP47) (Tuesday, 2 April)

Jan Wielemaker

• Turtle version naming? (Friday, 19 April)

Jeremy J Carroll

• Re: [PROPOSAL: Turtle: EDITORIAL. Concepts: Non-ED] Language Tag Case Conflict (between RDF1.1 and BCP47) (Tuesday, 2 April)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)

Magnus

• Definition of Inconsistency (Wednesday, 3 April)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON (Tuesday, 30 April)
• ISSUE-124: Futures / Order of parameters (was: Re: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Tuesday, 9 April)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: Futures (was: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Futures (was: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)

Markus Lanthaler

• RE: RDF/JSON (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: RDF/JSON (Monday, 29 April)
• RE: RDF/JSON (Sunday, 28 April)
• RE: RDF/JSON (Saturday, 27 April)
• RE: RDF-ISSUE-125 Futures (was: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• RDF-ISSUE-125 Futures vs. callbacks (was: Re: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Request for review of the application/ld+json media type (Tuesday, 16 April)
• Request for JSON-LD API review (was: Coordination) (Tuesday, 16 April)
• FW: RDF-ISSUE-124 (order-of-parameters): Order of parameters (options or callback last) - by Boris Zbarsky [JSON-LD Last Call 1] (Tuesday, 16 April)

Martin Nally

• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Fwd: RDF/JSON (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: RDF/JSON (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: RDF/JSON (Monday, 29 April)

Nathan

• Re: JSON-LD should be an RDF syntax (Monday, 29 April)

Norbert Lindenberg

• Re: Futures (was: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Definition of Inconsistency (Wednesday, 3 April)

Peter Ansell

• Re: Fwd: RDF/JSON (Tuesday, 30 April)
• Re: RDF/JSON (Monday, 29 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: RDF/JSON (Saturday, 27 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Thursday, 18 April)
• Re: Turtle implementation report for RDF::Trine (Wednesday, 17 April)

poccil14@gmail.com

• My new Turtle RDF parser for Java (Tuesday, 2 April)

Ruben Verborgh

• Re: node-n3 Turtle parser => compliance report? (Wednesday, 10 April)
• node-n3 Turtle parser => compliance report? (Wednesday, 10 April)
• [RESOLVED] Re: normalization issues with Turtle spec tests (Sunday, 7 April)
• Re: normalization issues with Turtle spec tests (Sunday, 7 April)
• normalization issues with Turtle spec tests (Saturday, 6 April)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Turtle version naming? (Friday, 19 April)
• Re: Futures (Thursday, 18 April)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Futures (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-124: Futures / Order of parameters (was: Re: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-124: Futures / Order of parameters (was: Re: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: ISSUE-124: Futures / Order of parameters (was: Re: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Futures (was: Request for JSON-LD API review) (Wednesday, 17 April)
• Re: Request for JSON-LD API review (was: Coordination) (Tuesday, 16 April)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2013 23:21:38 UTC