W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Re: Miscellaneous Turtle issues

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 12:02:13 -0400
To: Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, "public-rdf-comments@w3.org" <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, RDF-WG WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110908160208.GB27040@w3.org>
* Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com> [2011-09-07 06:41-0700]
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com> wrote:
> > Miscellaneous Turtle issues:
> > The Turtle test-suite manifest [1] [2] have content type text/n3, probably
> > should be text/turtle.
> 
> Yeah, likely shouldn't be:
> Content-Type: text/n3; qs=0.89

fixable with a .htaccess, but I'll try to update the www.w3.org
mime.types instead.

> I imagine we need to talk to the Web Master on that one.
> 
> > The Tests index page [3] has a visual link
> > to  http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-turtle-20110809/tests/, but it actually
> > links back to the spec.
> 
> Huh, I wasn't even aware there was an index.html for the test pages,
> and it's not in dvcs. Perhaps Eric can add that file to mercurial?

done. The one in TR was cribbed from the apache output of
<http://www.w3.org/2010/01/Turtle/tests/>.

> > Section 2.5 of the spec [3] references the "Collections" section, which just
> > links back to itself. It probably was intended to have a Collections section
> > similar to 3.5 of [4].
> 
> Ugh, yes. Thought I'd fixed that.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Gavin
> 
> > Gregg
> > [1] manifest.ttl
> > [2] manifest-bad.ttl
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-turtle-20110809/
> > [4] http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/2008/SUBM-turtle-20080114/
> >

-- 
-ericP
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 16:02:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 September 2011 16:02:51 GMT