W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Detailed review of R2RML test cases, parts 0000-0006

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:42:00 +0000
Cc: Public-Rdb2rdf-Wg RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1CF13609-B4A7-431D-AA84-90BA2133D8D9@cyganiak.de>
To: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>

On 12 Mar 2012, at 01:03, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
> On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:59 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>> 3. As said in the call, the base IRI is an additional input into the mapping process, besides the database. It is *not* the value of @base in the mapping file.
> 
> As far as I remember we decided to include the base IRI in the beginning of the document, right?. I think this base IRI will be the same for the DM, right? Eric? Juan? 

I guess you could say something like:

[[
Throughout all test cases, we use the base IRI <http://example.com/>:

• to turn relative IRIs generated by the Direct Mapping into absolute IRIs,
• as the required “<a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/#dfn-base-iri">base IRI</a>” input to the R2RML processor.
]]

Richard



> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Boris
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 10:42:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 12 March 2012 10:42:31 GMT