- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 13:05:14 +0000
- To: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Public-Rdb2rdf-Wg RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 6 Mar 2012, at 11:36, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: >>> so, the resultant object would be an IRI ? >>> <> >> >> Yes. > > In order to generate the html doc [1], I'm using NxParser [2] for parsing the output files (nq files), and currently it has some problems parsing that URIs. I'll look for a work around. It seems to be there is a new version of the parser [3]. FWIW, here's the spec for data URLs: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2397 If NxParser doesn't accept it, then that's a bug and should be reported to the authors. As I said, this data URL works in every modern web browser, so it isn't some exotic fringe syntax either. Best, Richard > > Boris > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/TestCases > [2] http://sw.deri.org/2006/08/nxparser/ > [3] http://code.google.com/p/nxparser/ > > > >> Richard >> >> >> >> >> >>> >>> Best >>> >>> Boris >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/#R2RMLTC0016e >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Richard >>>> >>>> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_URI_scheme >>> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 13:05:51 UTC