W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Are empty R2RML mappings valid?

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:07:14 -0700
Message-ID: <4FDCE772.60808@oracle.com>
To: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org


On 6/16/2012 12:05 PM, Juan Sequeda wrote:
> [[
> An R2RML mapping defines a mapping from a relational database to RDF. It is a structure that consists of one or more triples maps.
> ]]
How about we change "one or more" to "zero or more"
Ashok

Received on Saturday, 16 June 2012 20:06:06 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: Are empty R2RML mappings valid?"
Previous message: Juan Sequeda: "Re: Are empty R2RML mappings valid?"
In reply to: Juan Sequeda: "Re: Are empty R2RML mappings valid?"
Next in thread: Richard Cyganiak: "Re: Are empty R2RML mappings valid?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 16 June 2012 20:06:07 GMT