- From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:55:03 +0200
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Public-Rdb2rdf-Wg RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Yes, Richard you are right, Ivan needs to deploy those, when he is back from holidays. On Jul 25, 2012, at 8:03 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > Boris, Ivan, > > I guess that Ivan needs to deploy those? > > Best, > Richard > > > On 17 Jul 2012, at 00:11, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > >> Hi Ivan, Richard >> >> You can find at [1] a zip file containing >> - the html file describing the vocab. >> - the ttl file that contains the vocab in Turtle format >> - the rdf file that contains the vocab in RDF/XML format >> >> Best, >> >> Boris >> >> >> [1] http://mccarthy.dia.fi.upm.es/rdb2rdf/vocab/r2rml.zip >> >> On Jul 13, 2012, at 7:43 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >> >>> Hi Boris, >>> >>> A few changes are needed in the R2RML namespace document. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/ns/r2rml >>> >>> The vocabulary has a property rr:refObjectMap which doesn't exist in the language any more. >>> >>> The range of rr:objectMap should be the union of rr:ObjectMap and rr:RefObjectMap. >>> >>> The new class rr:TermMap needs to be added. It is a superclass of rr:SubjectMap, rr:PredicateMap, rr:ObjectMap and rr:GraphMap. Suggested additional triples: >>> >>> rr:TermMap rdfs:label "Term Map"@en. >>> rr:TermMap rdfs:comment "A function that generates an RDF term from a logical table row."@en. >>> >>> I think the current RDFS document can be simplified a bit by using rr:TermMap in a few places where currently the union of the four subclasses is used. >>> >>> Thanks and all the best, >>> Richard >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 21:55:29 UTC