Re: Making R2RML ready for CR

Ivan,

On 31 Jan 2012, at 15:48, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> In particular I need input regarding the CR exit criteria for the SotD, and help with the other SotD boilerplate. Ivan?
> 
> The CR exit criteria is to be decided by the WG. *Usually* we say that there should be 2 independent implementation for every feature in the spec, but what 'every feature' means is up to us to decide. And we may also formulate another criteria.

Right, so these bits in the SotD still requires WG resolutions:

* CR exit criteria 
* Date for end of CR period
* Format we recommend for implementation reports

> I guess there was some sort of an agreement on not defining another mailing list for the comments (which is fine with me, b.t.w.).

My impression too.

> Anything else?

I believe I need a paragraph of boilerplate for the beginning of the SotD, starting “This document is a Candidate Recommendation …”. It should say that we resolved all LC issues and so on.

Richard

Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 16:13:34 UTC