W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Fixes required in Test Cases and Implementation Report docs

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 16:54:03 -0700
Message-ID: <5019C19B.7000308@oracle.com>
To: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
CC: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, W3C RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Thank you, Boris!  This is great!

Richard, Eric:
Can you update the SOTD in your documents with the URL for the implementation report?
And the R2RML needs to update a reference to the Implementation report.
I think that is all we need.
All the best, Ashok

On 8/1/2012 4:46 PM, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote:
> Hi Richard
>
> Thank you very much for taking care of this.
>
> I updated both documents with your comments.
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/
>
> Please let me know if there are more issues to solve.
>
> Thanks again
>
> Boris
>
>
> On Aug 1, 2012, at 11:16 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
>> Boris, Michael,
>>
>> My understanding is that TC and ImplRep will be published as W3C Notes. This means they get both timestamped URLs and permalinks in the http://www.w3.org/TR/ space.
>>
>> I understand that these are the latest candidate documents:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/NOTE-rdb2rdf-tc-20120724/
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/implementation-report/NOTE-rdb2rdf-ir-20120724/
>>
>> I reviewed both from a W3C style point of view and they still need quite a few changes! A list is below.
>>
>> (I can help make those changes tomorrow morning if necessary.)
>>
>> Best,
>> Richard
>>
>>
>> 1. Date of publication needs to be changed to 14 August 2012
>>
>> 2. “This version” needs to point to correct timestamped URL *in TR space*
>>
>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-test-cases/
>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-implementations/
>>
>> 3. “Latest version” needs to point to untimestamped shortname *in TR space*
>>
>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-test-cases-20120814/
>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-rdb2rdf-implementations-20120814/
>>
>> 4. SotD needs to be for a NOTE, not for an ED. I'm not sure what exactly the SotD should say, but I guess you can use these as rough templates:
>>
>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/
>> • http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/
>>
>> 5. References in the ImplRep need to use URLs in TR space with correct date, timestamp, and without “work in progress” markers.
>>
>> 6. Many URLs in the body of both documents need to be updated from ED or from old WD/CR to latest PR URLs (or alrernatively to untimestamped shortname URL in TR space). This includes all the spec references in the TC, and all the TC links in the ImplRep.
>>
>> 7. TC Section 4 contains a messed-up link to "Section 10 of the R2RML specification"; I guess the intended target URL is http://www.w3.org/TR/r2rml/#note-natural-mapping-extensions
>>
>> 8. ImplRep Section 4 (References) contains a messed-up reference for [RDB2RDF TC], there is some stuff about RDFa in there!?
>>
>> 9. ImplRep calls it once [Direct Mapping] and then [DM]
>>
>> 10. ImplRep defines a ref for [RDB2RDF-WG] that is never used, delete!
>
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 23:53:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:29 UTC