Re: labeling tests varying only by tested database

+1
I'll include the IRIs for the dbms.
Thanks Richard/Eric


On Apr 27, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> +1. It would be even better with IRIs for the databases, which you could add here:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDB2RDF/SQL_Version_IRIs
> 
> Best,
> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> On 27 Apr 2012, at 16:31, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> 
>> http://swobjects.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/swobjects/branches/sparql11/tests/DM-report-EARL.ttl
>> has entries like
>> 
>> [] a earl:Assertion;
>>      earl:assertedBy tests:test_DM.cpp ;
>>      earl:result [
>>           a earl:TestResult ;
>>           earl:outcome earl:passed
>>      ] ;
>>      earl:subject swobj:project ;
>>      earl:test rdb2rdf:D000-1table1column0rows ;
>>      earl:info "mysql" .
>> 
>> followed by two more, identical except for the earl:info identifying
>> the database:
>> 
>> [] a earl:Assertion;
>>      earl:assertedBy tests:test_DM.cpp ;
>>      earl:result [
>>           a earl:TestResult ;
>>           earl:outcome earl:passed
>>      ] ;
>>      earl:subject swobj:project ;
>>      earl:test rdb2rdf:D000-1table1column0rows ;
>>      earl:info "postgres" .
>> 
>> [] a earl:Assertion;
>>      earl:assertedBy tests:test_DM.cpp ;
>>      earl:result [
>>           a earl:TestResult ;
>>           earl:outcome earl:passed
>>      ] ;
>>      earl:subject swobj:project ;
>>      earl:test rdb2rdf:D000-1table1column0rows ;
>>      earl:info "oracle" .
>> 
>> Is this a helpful format for reporting running the same test with
>> different databases?
>> -- 
>> -ericP
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Monday, 30 April 2012 15:27:21 UTC